Lake Errock Gravel Pit Redevelopment

I am very opposed to the gravel pit development. My home is directly opposite the proposed treatment center. The disruption of enjoyment of my property will be in jeopardy - re noise from mechanism of treatment center and is there a GUARANTEE of no smell and run off I don't want to think about as it would go through my property or into the small spawning creek 1 house over. The development co. said the run-off could be drank like water. I would really like to see the owner and developer actually drink that water. That is well and good that the first nations are for it but their homes are not directly across from this site. I hope you are listening to the residents of Lake Errock and taking into consideration of the pristine conditions of our residential and lake area.
Crossing the highway would not be a problem for the residents of the gravel pit and crossing the tracks and onto the cul-de -sac in front of my place to get to the park at the lake - would be a problem for my quiet end of the lake.
I find the highway summer, spring, winter and fall is busy day and night - traffic has increased considerably. And the noise from trains cars etc is enough without an added 600 people and their cars. Most of us left congestion behind and came to Lake Errock to enjoy the country atmosphere.
The original plan was palpable but this plan is really ridiculous. If this is approved I will take this further to oppose the placement of the treatment plant. I asked if the FVRD is doing their own studies for this site and was told no - that they have engineers to look at the plans - I would like to see an independent survey done.
Dissatified resident

To all people who care about Lake Errock (Squakum Lake) , Deroche, and British Columbia,

I attended the applicants open houses in April and June of this year. I found it extremely informative and was able to have all my questions answered. I also found the Fraser Valley regional district information meeting in November also very informative, and I had all my questions answered. After consideration of many public comments, and professionals input, I highly support the application in its form as presented. I am extremely pleased to have confirmation of support from both first nation communities directly affected by this development. I find Joey and Scowlitz (Sq'éwlets) First Nation to the east, and Leq'a:mel First Nation to the west extremely knowledgeable. I am very happy for their support for the development to proceed. I appreciate greatly the net benefits to the first nations salmon enhancement project and environmental benefit to the aquifer,Lake Errock, and Harrison river directly benefiting from the development proceeding. The Lake Errock existing community of 110 lots would not be acceptable at today’s standards. The small lots and old style septic systems adversely affect the groundwater aquifer and the lake water Health and effects on the wildlife and fish. This new development including its sewage treatment plant has the potential to offer the remedy to correct the environmental damage occurring as a result of the old septic systems on the existing Lake Errock properties. I’m very excited to see that the sewer treatment plant will directly help Joey and the Scowlitz (Sq'éwlets) First Nation community. I’m almost also excited to see Scowlitz (Sq'éwlets) First Nation and Leq'a:mel First Nation identifying the need for more new housing and the expectations for both first nations buying some of these newly built properties for their use. The housing units will provide diverse housing options by design and pricing to create affordability to the surrounding communities including Sasquatch mountain and many nearby farms. The various employment opportunities nearby lack the ability to provide housing to the labour market. Also many of the children of the long term families are unable to buy housing that’s affordable and often leave the community to Chilliwack or Mission to fulfill their housing needs. I have no concerns regarding the school system because the school system is a Provincial responsibility and we all know the government funding and new schools will not be built until the population warrants it. Once the family and children’s come the provincial government will provide the necessary school funding and teachers to support our children, and new schools will be built. The next benefit to the environment is to close the operating gravel pit and develop the surface to improve the impact on the environment. The developer will design and grade with geotechnical engineers and certify the area to ensure slope stability.This will be the elimination of noise and dust pollution currently existing. We always see people saying not in my backyard. But putting all opinions aside is to evaluate the development on the merits of the project and its direct impact on wildlife, fish,the land, the environment, all people including first nations people who were here first. It is clearly obvious that for every reason this development should proceed and make the many positive changes for the net benefit of the land, the air, the water, the environment, the wildlife, the fish, and the people.I support this application as presented and would like to see 2 new trees planted for each new unit created on the land.
Sincerely,
Ron

To whom it may concern:
Why is GWEB Holdings Ltd. Allowed to dispense with the original offer made to Lake Errock residents of 58 homes to be built on the gravel pit.





With approximately 200 homes, traffic, the influx of visitors will over burden the ecological and aquatic health of the lake.

At the last meeting the question of light pollution was raised, and we were told that lighting would be pointed downwards. For people living at the north side of the lake lights pointing downwards will be aimed directly to our homes. Surely motion sensor lighting should be considered. Streetlights should automatically turn off “ with an photoelectric sensor.
Streetlights generally turn off “automagically” when the photoelectric sensor (typically located on the upper surface of each fixture in residential areas, or in a unit controlling a large bank of streetlights on highways) receives sufficient light from night transitioning into day. It is well known light pollution has an adverse effect on our wildlife and should seriously be considered when building homes.

Sincerely,
Sylvia Langmann
Lake Errock

At the last meeting the question of light pollution was raised, and we were told that lighting would be pointed downwards. For people living at the north side of the lake lights pointing downwards will be aimed directly to our homes. Surely motion sensor lighting should be considered. Streetlights should automatically turn off “ with an photoelectric sensor.

I attended the meeting held Nov. 23rd. at which time I voiced my opposition to this development. Several years ago we were told it would be 65 units. Now we're told it is 290 units and along with that basement suites and coach houses will probably be allowed to help purchasers. This means our little community is going to explode! Let's round it out to 300 units. At least 2 people per unit is 600 people but we all know that the majority of units will have more than 2 people so we are looking at least 1,000 people ( most likely 1,200+). Each household will have a minimum of 2 cars, some more so that is another 600+ vehicles on a roadway which is already crowded during summer months. The excuse is that it will provide lower priced homes but even the cheapest single unit will be in excess of $800,000, more likely 850,000-900,000. That is still out of reach for a lot of families. The people who will be moving into these homes would want garbage pickup, streetlights and the other utilities that are provided in urban areas. They will not be willing to adapt to our rural lifestyle. Their lifestyle will be inflicted on those of us who want a more peaceful, more basic lifestyle. I was upset when I heard 65 units were planned but I'd settle for 65 units but never close to 300! Tell the developers to go somewhere else. Most of us don't want them.

The hydrolist was introduced as having done a report for the FVRD as well as for the mine owner.
Can you please send a copy and /or let me know when posted on the website.
He mentioned that it takes 6 days for runoff to travel subsurface to the lake, but also commented on how quickly runoff is absorbed by the aggregate. It was good to hear that sewage treatment is at a high standard to remove nitrogen and phosphorus, but the concerns mentioned tonight we're also about runoff contamination from the lawn fertilizer, pesticides, etc. So sharing the hydrologists reports should help answer those questions.

Thanks for your answer tonight regarding MoTI involvement. Does FVRD get any timing or proposed Lougheed hwy expansion plans, when developments are reviewed? We thought that since the Hemlock Valley OCP is already approved by the FVRD board, that you'd have more details?
We'd hope the highway would be improved, well before anything at the mine may happen.

Where will all the garbage be taken to, the additional residences would overwelhm the transfer station.

What is the possibility that those who do not get septic, water services, or upgrades; and live in the area, will see increased taxes for this addition to the area, and the upgrades.

Would there be any money to look at increasing the NFFD Hall to accomidate a possible 2nd truck or First responder vehicle? Also have you considered a full time firefighter for that hall.

With all the added homes, and the fact that basement rental suites will be allowed, have you looked at the traffic on Hwy 7. I would expect this will add at lease 1000 vehicles to the area.

Has standpipe and Hydrants been investigated for the NFFD to be able to respond to home fires?

How much water capacity is there? I am concerned that the connection to the lake Errock water system will jeopardize that water supply. I would like to see sanitary services for lake Errock included in this plan, not as a "maybe in the future" idea.
We will need improvement to the highway and school capacity.

Where is the water supply coming from ? Can Lougheed Highway accommodate anymore trafic as it is only two lane highway ?

I don't have a problem with progress and development provided it is done intelligently and with respect to current residents. I also feel that people who will have their lives disrupted should get reparation. We need to have the option of connecting to the septic/sewer system at no cost to the homeowner, we need our 'water debt' paid off and we need GWEB Holdings to advocate on our behalf to have natural gas brought into our area and our hydro grid improved.

What about water and septic for all these extra buildings in the Lake Erick area? Extra Traffic will be a problem also getting in and out of this building site?

Where's the aquafer impact / QEP report?